home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Aminet 4
/
Aminet 4 - November 1994.iso
/
aminet
/
dev
/
amos
/
amosl0794.lzh
/
AMOSLIST
/
000139_amos-request@svcs1.digex.net_Sat Jul 30 13:00:11 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-08-01
|
2KB
Received: from hela.INS.CWRU.Edu by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA15644
(5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <mcox@access.digex.net>); Sat, 30 Jul 1994 13:00:09 -0400
Received: from svcs1.digex.net (svcs1.digex.net [164.109.10.23]) by hela.INS.CWRU.Edu with SMTP (8.6.8.1+cwru/CWRU-2.1-freenet-gw)
id MAA23442; Sat, 30 Jul 1994 12:59:57 -0400 (from amos-request@svcs1.digex.net)
Received: by svcs1.digex.net id AA28238
(5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for amos-out); Sat, 30 Jul 1994 10:57:34 -0400
Received: from nfs1.digex.net by svcs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA28234
(5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <amos@svcs1.digex.net>); Sat, 30 Jul 1994 10:57:32 -0400
Received: from cs.hope.edu (smaug.cs.hope.edu) by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA12281
(5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <amos-list@access.digex.net>); Sat, 30 Jul 1994 10:57:30 -0400
Received: by cs.hope.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4 (Mod 5/10/94.8))
id AA11785; Sat, 30 Jul 1994 10:57:27 +0500
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 1994 10:57:27 +0500
From: Ben Marty <marty@cs.hope.edu>
Message-Id: <9407301457.AA11785@cs.hope.edu>
To: amos-list@access.digex.net
Subject: EasyLife Problem
Content-Length: 889
Status: RO
I tested the easylife extension on TechnoVenture. It did pretty well
I guess... just one or two serious problems (Unreferenced variables). I was
passing a parameter that i didn't use in one procedure. The other problems
weren't so serious. They were all undeclared variables (or something), but
all variables I expected to be zero or didn't care what they were at the
beginning. But I have some consolation in the fact that TechnoVenture
testing also found a problem in the accessory (I guess it's not such a
"consolation" to Paul Hickman). The following program will cause an
unnecessary Unreferenced variable notice:
TEST
B=Param
If(B mod 4)=1 Then Print "hi"
Procedure TEST
End Proc[5]
It doesn't believe that the variable B is referenced. Silly me, I probably
didn't need to make a procedure... I just wanted to make it as similar to the
original program segment as possible.